ad

Council chiefs’ pay under fire from North Wales AM

Published date: 02 February 2012 |
Published by: Staff reporter


 

A POLITICIAN has slammed the “grossly inflated” salaries paid to council chiefs.

Wrexham and Flintshire councils chief executives picked up more than £130,000 last year but North Wales AM Antoinette Sandbach says the pay packets are hard to justify.

Colin Everett, who heads Flintshire Council, was paid a total of £171,543 in 2010-11, which includes £31,279 in pension contributions and pay for his roles as returning officer and clerk to the North Wales Fire and Rescue Authority.

Wrexham Council paid out £133,247, including pension contributions of £24,207, in respect of its chief executive post over the same period.

Former chief Isobel Garner resigned in December 2010 and her role was filled on an interim basis by the authority’s three strategic and performance directors.

Ms Sandbach said the salaries of some senior employees are “difficult to justify.”

“From the publicly available figures we have obtained, 29 employees in Conwy
County Borough Council earn over £70,000 per annum, as do 23 in Flintshire, 11 in Gwynedd, 23 in Wrexham, 19 in Denbighshire, and 13 in Anglesey, she said.

“How can these figures be explained to council tax payers in these current harsh economic times when households are having to tighten their belts and are seeing their public services squeezed?”

The figures come as both Wrexham and Flintshire councils are preparing to make budget cuts in the region of £3.5 million in 2012-13.

Flintshire council leader Arnold Woolley said senior officers’ earnings had remained about the same level for several years.

“I know the efforts and hours that go into these jobs,” he said.

“I believe we are getting good value for money. We have a good team who have got a lot of work to do.

“The executive and scrutiny committees ensure our officers perform and hold them to account if they do not.”

Cllr Woolley said similar roles in the private sector could draw significantly higher salaries.

Flintshire Council’s head of human resources Helen Stappleton said salary banding for the role of chief executive had not been reviewed since 2007

She said: “There are additional pay elements relating to other duties such as acting as returning officer and for rendering certain services to the North Wales Fire Service, but these will vary year to year and do not form part of the basic salary.

“Our chief executive has voluntarily deferred increments in his pay band to which he is entitled and has forgone reclaiming in-county mileage, subsistence and other costs as a personal contribution to efficiency savings during a time of extremely restricted public finance.

“The chief executive’s position does not attract performance related pay or significant fringe benefits unlike similar positions in other public and private sector organisations.”

Wrexham Council said information about senior officers’ pay was freely available on its website and current chief Helen Paterson is paid £105,000 a year.

A council spokeswoman said: “The chief executive is also the returning officer for Wrexham and Clwyd South and has overall responsibility for the conduct of elections.

“Although appointed by the council, the role of the returning officer is distinct and separate from their duties as an employee of the council.

“The fees payable in this role are variable and mainly prescribed by central government.

“The chief executive, as with most other local government employees, is entitled to be a member of the Local Government Pension Scheme.”

You must be a registered user to leave a comment. Register or login here.

  1. Posted by: a cahill at 14:31 on 02 February 2012 Report

    Roles as Returning Officers are distinct from Chief Excutive duties..... as elections take place during the working week.... do they have to take a days leave to carry them out...needs more explanation

  2. Posted by: InMyOpinion at 14:36 on 02 February 2012 Report

    Council's are quick enough to defend themselves when there are people getting unfair amounts, Do they really deserve the amount being paid? Wrexham has been suffering £10million a year cutbacks from its council, but still they throw money around themselves like confetti... Council leader £47,000 for being part time... that's less than 20 hours per week... and how do you justify £100k+ to sit in meetings nodding your head all day with 2 months a year holidays ?

  3. Posted by: wonderwho at 15:01 on 02 February 2012 Report

    Ok Ms Sandbach here is your chance to make a name for yourself after being out in the cold all these years trying to get on the political platform, the councils get most of their money from the Welsh Assembly of which you are now a minister - what are you going to do about it then???

  4. Posted by: truth hurts at 15:10 on 02 February 2012 Report

    Cllr Woolley is on another planet. For us mere mortals, we do not get paid anywhere near what these characters get, more than the Home secretary for instance! Oh and considering Mr Everett has set up home with Ms Garner, the good people of Flintshire & Wrexham are funding them a considerable sum!

  5. Posted by: alidyl73 at 15:28 on 02 February 2012 Report

    This amount of money is obscene. Cllr. Woolley needs to come into the real world. There are people struggling to keep a roof over their heads while he and his colleagues attend a few meetings and shuffle the paperwork at our expense. That man is not fit to be Leader of FCC, May is on the horizon!

  6. Posted by: InMyOpinion at 15:45 on 02 February 2012 Report

    Helen Paterson's £105k pa equates to several hundred pounds per working day + pension.... I fail to see any justification for amounts of this magnitude.... they are in my view excessive....but you can bet the last penny in your pocket nothing will be done about it.

  7. Posted by: Roland Cleth at 17:01 on 02 February 2012 Report

    Anyone taking on a job with such a level of responsibility in the private sector would get paid considerably more. A very simple fact. They have a damn sight more to do than members of the SWAG.

  8. Posted by: Hen ddraig at 17:42 on 02 February 2012 Report

    wonderwho...... When did the conservative Ms Sandbach become a minister. Everetts salary does not seem excessive when you consider he is responsible for a budget of 240 million pounds and around 7000 staff. But his other minor roles could be carried out by people who need the money

  9. Posted by: Hen ddraig at 17:46 on 02 February 2012 Report

    I think we should be more concerned about the salaries, expenses and other perks of the people who are supposed to represent us in Cardiff and Westminster

  10. Posted by: liberty1 at 19:41 on 02 February 2012 Report

    you can argue that some are overpaid but if the likes of us were in these jobs would we be willing to take pay cuts?

  11. Posted by: griffo at 20:35 on 02 February 2012 Report

    isnt it nice that that the cheif exec has forgone claiming in county mileage and subsistence.so he has to do what the rest of us do....fill his car up with petrol and take a packed lunch!!

  12. Posted by: richard5 at 21:14 on 02 February 2012 Report

    Colin Everett's salary is criminal.That makes him on over £3,000 a week ! how can this be justified ? other employees are on the bread line whilst he is grossly overpaid . Helen Stappleton no doubt is also overpaid and on a good salary. It needs investigating and salaries like this cut to save money.

  13. Posted by: liberty1 at 21:38 on 02 February 2012 Report

    r5, last year we had public sector workers taking strike action about their pay and pensions, we had people slacking them off on here, people on £3,000 a week are the ones who should be ashamed not those on £12/14,000, but some people have a political agenda to adhere to.

  14. Posted by: liberty1 at 21:42 on 02 February 2012 Report

    r5, £12/14,000 per year that is, (there are politicaly motivated K***h***s on here who would jump on an error like that)

  15. Posted by: griffo at 07:25 on 03 February 2012 Report

    i agree that people with responsibilities should be paid a higher wage.....but £3000 a week,thats obscene!even if his wages were cut by half,he still would not face the reality that most of his constituants.long hours for minimum wage and childcare costs on top!!!i bet he sleeps ok at night!

  16. Posted by: Bruin_bear at 08:09 on 03 February 2012 Report

    Overpaid is the word, Colin Everett, £3200 per week, Helen Paterson, £2000 per week... why is there no basic wage for these people, why is there pay more than the PM's? its not as if they actually do much is it?

  17. Posted by: wonderwho at 08:24 on 03 February 2012 Report

    Sorry Hen ddraig Assembly Member but still a member of the club in Cardiff who seem to have a lot to say but do very little when in comes to sorting out the local councils, I see that a W O Minister was going to sort them out but now moved on to fill the potholes in our roads in Wales

  18. Posted by: alidyl73 at 08:35 on 03 February 2012 Report

    Yes people are paid phenomenal salaries out in the private sector. Here in Flintshire we have to ask is Colin worth it? There is the argument that he handled budgets of millions, but then they use the same argument to justify Kerry Feather's Salary of 150 K. A lot of public money is being paid to those in high office and they can't even get anything as simple as waste management running properly.

  19. Posted by: watchdog at 10:12 on 03 February 2012 Report

    This is the year of the sponger as it is local election year with the CEO getting their bonus for just heading up the election machine. What a SCANDAL all this is . Councillors allowances are out of control and Leaders allowances are beyond belief. One thing is certain, nothing will happen. The gravy train will trundle on.

  20. Posted by: InMyOpinion at 16:49 on 03 February 2012 Report

    watchdog: spot on... nothing will happen, Shan Wilkinson might not have been the best council leader... but she had the decency to turn down the increase of thousands while successfully predicting a recession by implementing £10m a year cutbacks. the following year she lost her seat to a Lib/Dem, and as we see £45k pa for less than 20 hours a week.

  21. Posted by: JonJohn at 18:30 on 03 February 2012 Report

    I agree with you Roland , those in the swag do little if anything but mouth off when they see others getting more than them, I think shes jealous.

  22. Posted by: griffo at 21:15 on 03 February 2012 Report

    pay on deliverance!!!perhaps we would get what we're promised.

  23. Posted by: Vote_No_To_Stock_Transfer at 11:51 on 06 February 2012 Report

    I'd like to know how the Executive Member for Housing can justify drawing £24,000 p.a. whilst presiding over a department running a six-figure debt and simultaneously orchestrating the give-away of the council's most valuable capital asset, its (our) housing stock. We are paying the vandals who are destroying the infrastructure they were elected to protect.

  24. Posted by: edyjo at 14:44 on 06 February 2012 Report

    I would like to know how much the friends of the MP's and AM's are raking in for the role of support staff. some of those people are councillors as well. doubletaker's !!!! Pity she didnt have that published as well.

  25. Posted by: Y FFin at 21:49 on 07 February 2012 Report

    The role of Chief Executive is very different to that of an MP or AM. Chief Execs have legal, managerial and financial responsibilities, whereas politicians are really little more than talkers and occasionally listeners. If Chief Execs are overpaid, then where does that leave politicos with their £65,000 basic salary plus allowances and pensions?

  26. Posted by: edyjo at 21:58 on 07 February 2012 Report

    AM's and MP's get 65K and they dont do a full weeks work! Do they pay their friends who man the phones or whatever else they say they do out of their allowance. I think not! Maybe this paper could get that info and publish it, get quite a few comments i think

Featured Businesses

    View all adverts

    Resources